Sunday, July 1st, 2007
Review: Essential Web 2007 - Session 2
Lets directly dive in for session 2. We only got 10 seconds to stand up and relax after session 1, so I only took a minute to relax after my previous review to write this. The second session was lead by Mike Reid (Director of Venture Capital), Nadim Saad (Result UK) and Paul Fisher (Advent), and the presenting companies where all about how to get the consumer attention. I must say it didn’t get much better as some of the companies where even more amazingly non-web2.0 than others. It is amazing how so many businesses don’t get that people seriously do not like advertising. You will understand what I am saying in a moment.
Spotify is probably the first or second-most ridiculous idea I heard during essential web. When the founder started talking about the concept, it all started out very interesting. They had taken a look at society and they noticed that people just prefer downloading music from illegal sources because it is free, quick, easy, and DRM free. To solve the issue of it also being illegal they ventured on a journey to make music available to anyone both legally and freely. How are they planning to do this? Through advertising. By placing ads in your free music they will try to convince people to download the music via their service.
Are they serious? Nobody wants to go to the trouble of downloading music to get a free advertisement with every MP3. If people would like that, they would all be listening to radio! I am seriously not convinced by this concept as I think it will either become a source for people to download music and then rip out the ads, or it will just never lift of because it annoys people. We don’t know yet as they haven’t launched yet, but I will be looking forward to their release.

If Spotify isn’t the worst idea of the day that maybe We7 is. Basically they offer exactly the same value (none?) to consumers as Spotify. What the difference between them both is is difficult to say as Spotify hasn’t released yet, but I think it is probably the same stupid idea. The weird thing is that I tried the We7 site and was amazed by how badly it was implemented. The interface of the site is messy and they send mixed signals with both “buy” options and “add to playlist” options.
I tested the songs from some vague Latin band (they only seem to have vague bands) and basically every song has a 8 second intro going something like: “The time for We7 is now”. How annoying is that?! It is like having a radio station that keeps broadcasting the same advertisement over and over again on a very high frequency. Really want to see where they are going, as I again don’t think they will get far.
ImageLoop could at best be called interesting. They try to venture where YouTube has ventured before, but in this case focusing on slideshows. Their reasoning is that slideshows offer a middle ground between photos and videos. I admit, I recently had to be creative to post my Flickr photos of Essential Web to this blog so I was interested in a good tool. It is a bit sad though that their product focuses a lot on the MySpace folks with a whole set of cheesy themes, frames and animations. Additionally they forgot to integrate support for Facebook, which is quickly becoming more massive than MySpace.
In the end this product has some clear disadvantages from a technical perspective. Where YouTube became a success for their big repository of videos and quick integration with blogs, Imageloop doesn’t seem to have their own content or community that creates photos. Like Jyri from Jaiku said during the recent Geek Dinner: “every social network needs an object to revolve around”. And although you might say that this would be slideshows in the case of Imageloop, you will still need to have photos to make them. In the end they do offer a weird Flickr integration, but I wonder if this will convince any photo fanatics (who will be on Flickr) to use this tool.
Seatwave caused some mixed reactions. Their idea is to have an online portal for the selling of second hand concert tickets. Their biggest strength really is the guarantees they offer, as they track ticket-IDs and all other details of the ticket, this was guaranteeing you will get the exact ticket as advertised. They even offer 150% refunds if anything happens to go wrong, which kind of means that they are taking control of any trust issues you might have. Their business model seems to rely on selling cancellation insurances, which is a new concept to me for concert tickets.
I’m not that much of a concert goer, but the founder of Seatwave used to work for Ticketmaster and really seemed to understand the frustrations people get when buying second hand tickets. The mixed reactions Seatwave got though were because even though they did all this checking, they somehow hadn’t taken care of the issue of people only buying tickets to sell them with very high margins. Recently this has been a real issue, with many concerts being sold out but still leaving empty seats during the concert. The founder of Seatwave admitted that this was sad, but unfortunately very legal.
The last company of the second session was Wonga. Besides sounding a bit too much like Willy Wonka, the company announced themselves to offer a socially responsible solution to getting a quick very-short-term loan. All I actually heard was something in the direction of most of the current extremely annoying TV commercials where they try to get you more into debts than you already are.
Their idea of socially responsible is a short term loan of at most £200 (although I remember them giving a higher amount during the presentation) for at most 30 days. Besides paying back the debt, they would take 1% interest and a £25 fee. The organizer of the event quickly calculated this to be an annual interest rate of more than 50%, making their claim of a socially responsible solution very doubtful. In the end all the social they did proved to be all but web2.0 social. I actually think they meant to say transparent, as in just 1% interest and a £25 fee transparent.I just don’t like this company to the core. I rather have something like TipIt.to do something financial that is really social.









